Cut It Out / Replace???

Sharing this testimonial from a good friend

After three surgeries in my life, tonsillectomy, hysterectomy, and hip replacement, I now know so much more about it and the options I had but just didn’t realize at the time.

The tonsillectomy was my parent’s decision. I just was there. At the age of 16, I really didn’t know nor care about any options. My throat hurt. The doctor said the tonsils were inflamed and should come out. Now, of course, I realize that’s absurd. How easily doctors discard perfectly useful organs.

And why are they even there if they can be discarded so easily? Maybe the medicines they prescribe don’t work and actually make it worse. The body knows perfectly well how to repair tonsils. It’s the administering of toxic medicines that exacerbate the condition. Not only does the body have to restore the tonsils but has to process the additional chemicals introduced into the system.

There’s a cyclical trending that occurs in the surgical allopathic community where certain surgeries are advocated in large numbers. It’s like a “catch the wave” phenomenon. There’ll be a temporary surge in say, hysterectomies or appendectomies or prostrate removal and mastectomies.

In the case of my hysterectomy, there was no need to perform that surgery but after I was diagnosed with cervical cancer, the fear of that word “cancer” by family members led to my way to casual decision to gut the area with no knowledge of what was really happening in there.

First of all, I now know, the big C word simply meant the body was disposing of decay and that there is nothing deadly about it. The cancer process kicks in when regular, more subtle detoxification processes are inadequate to properly dispose of waste. The cancer process is the super hero that does the heavy duty clean up. Once the restoration is complete, there’s no need for that process and if there’s updated diagnostics, it will show the disappearance of the original cancer. Unless that was fabricated in the first place then they could, of course, fabricate it again.

The hip replacement surgery is particularly revealing about the diagnostics and whole surgery protocol.

First there’s the pain. That’s for real. There are diagnostic tests, x-rays to determine the conditions inside the socket. Two different doctors looked at the same x-rays and saw two different things.

One saw that the diverted pain the hip was coming from the back. He pointed to an x-ray that showed a cloudy area that was supposed to prove his diagnosis. The second doctor looked at his x-rays and saw a hip socket with arthritis as shown by the cloudy area in the picture. When I asked if it was all coming from the back, he said no it wasn’t. He said the hip socket was “bone on bone.”

I had heard that expression before and to me it meant, the socket is stripped of tissue that provides a cushion, and assumed there’s nothing I can do about it, leaving replacement as my only option. Looking back on that now, I would have to wonder…how do they know what’s going on in either the hip socket or the back by looking as vague shadows on a screen? It’s not like they’ve got a camera in there with live coverage of the activity. It’s a very blurry, indistinct representation of what’s going on in there. I would imagine, then, that they couple the images with personal experience and what’s generally approved by their specialty group to make their determination for treatment.

But two different doctors disagreed. That says there’s no absolute treatment option and that it’s more subjective depending on the particular doctor.

I went with the “bone on bone” scare concept and scheduled the surgery. But the pain was so bad I had to find out a way to endure it until the day of surgery. I found out about several exercises that very quickly began to relieve the pain. I stuck with them till the day of surgery and in the hospital as they were prepping me, the nurse asked what my pain level was zero to ten and I said zero.

That doesn’t go with the irreversible “bone on bone” concept. Clearly, something in that socket had rejuvenated to the extent that I no longer had any pain. How could that be if it was supposedly bone rubbing on bone with no cushion? That doesn’t make sense. I didn’t connect those dots at the time and I had the hip replaced. I now know that was an unnecessary surgery.

There’s no reason why any part of the body that needs restoration cannot restore as long as it’s balanced. Allopathic medicine isn’t particularly interested in restorative processes in the body that would eliminate certain unnecessary surgeries.