Tumors And Forever Chemicals

By Cheryl Kondratov 

This concept that there’s an accumulation of toxins in the body seems reasonable at first.  And the idea that accumulated toxins are consolidated in lumps and bumps and growths to make it more efficient to expel them sounds good.  But why would the body want to store toxins or accumulate them in a sack like enclosure?  First of all, those toxins are pleomorphic as are all things we perceive.  They are changing constantly.  There’s no way they can maintain their original properties once they have entered the body and are being processed out as usual.  So the presumption that these harmful substances are being stored to be eliminated later doesn’t actually make sense. 

What really happens to these toxins is that when they are being processed out of the body because the body has no use for them, they are going to do some damage to the normal functions of the body. That damage is evidenced by the presence of symptoms of repair and restoration.  If a lump forms - that is part of that restoration process.  No one has ever been able to definitively identify what those lumps contain.  The normal scientific method for extracting and analyzing specimens microscopically by default negates the ability to identify those contents.  The narrative about how the toxins are being consolidated in the tumor for eradication later is made up. Keep in mind those supposedly stored toxins are no longer toxic once they are involved in the normal elimination process.  Their properties are altered and their harmful qualities are diluted.  What would be the purpose of storing diluted substances that are no longer harmful to eliminate at a later time? 

A very common type of restoration lump is when the lymph gland forms a hard lump.  There’s something in the lump that is necessary to complete the restoration process.  Once the repair is completed and the balance is restored, the lump drains itself of the components that were necessary and it’s as if it never happened.  There are instances where that lump may not drain efficiently and in that case there’s a procedure used to drain it.  But that would depend on the original condition of the body prior to the formation of the lump. And there are certain restoration bumps that have emptied but the soft, empty sack remains.  If it’s not painful, isn’t bothering anything, or isn’t in a spot that is cosmetically undesirable, it can just remain in place.  That would depend on the circumstances and its location. 

There’s a misconception that these toxic substances that are manmade are resistant to degradation and are therefore remain in their harmful state forever in the body is a construct.  It’s not based on fact.  It’s based on fear.  Fear that we are subjected to harmful, deadly substances that cannot be eradicated from the body in the normal way and will remain stored in the body forever.   That would assume that manmade substances are derived from items that are not found in our natural world.  The production of harmful, toxic chemical compounds has to first start with ingredients that are available.  Then those ingredients are altered to make them toxic.  Therefore, all the substances involved in the creation of the manmade entity are subject to pleomorphism.  They will undergo transformation just like everything else in our world.  It’s not the components that are harmful but how they are processed to make the end products that renders them toxic.  It’s like sugar.  Sugar is not harmful. Sugar is beneficial. It’s nutritious sugarcane and in an organic form is beneficial to the body.  But by the time the food industry gets finished processing that it becomes harmful. 

Rather than sticking with these old concepts about lumps and bumps that illicit fear and anxiety and misdiagnosis, we can look at these formations as evidence that the body is doing exactly what it knows to do and doing it so efficiently, there’s nothing we need to fear.  We can be assured that the body is restoring balance and we do not need to interfere.